New Gametype Table

UhmmJenner

UhmmJenner

Active Partier
VIP
Jul 10, 2017
8
11
27
I played this game in a discord chat! As its very obvious lots of people like murder on mcpz. I haven't seen anyone do this on minecraft yet so here's my idea! <3

(Please note I am not that good with english grammar)

Everyone is a criminal ,and will be against each other, they each will sit at a table together and you're all trapped in a room.
You are trapped by a monster in the room. You will have to SACRIFICE one by one but you each will vote and the person with my most votes will die.
search
Until it comes to the final 2 the monster will choose randomly for one person to win, and set you free.
search


Ways of Winning:
Just don't DIE

Ways you can WIN:
Alliances
Persuading others
And much more things you should figure out >:D
Extra Perks:
One randomly chosen player will get a chance to have a saboteur power, one player will have to do a quest for an example having 2 people fight (but they cant let ANYONE know its them after the saboteur does those quests they will get safety for 2 trials and put 1 person automatically to death, But after the saboteur's safety ends everyone will vote who they think the saboteur is if ANYONE is right the saboteur will die)

Maps:
There will only be one map with a round table in a dark basement but you cant ever see the monster you can explore but there's only old items that are dusty and useless.

Although this isn't a really good idea i think it would be a unique mini game!

Thank you for reading this ,and I hope you will consider to put this in!


FAQ: (For questions below that I'll edit onto this thread)
 
Surely if people were to be voted out, it would end up being bias?

Let's say there was 8 people in that game and 6 of them was all friends/in a party. The two people who aren't in the party are most likely going to be voted out straight away, and in my opinion, that doesn't seem fair.

I still don't know, even giving them a secret identity may not work as they could still talk in their party, or giving them a secret identity is still similar to murder. I'll stay neutral for now.
 
This is a film, Its called The Circle

Edit: Its also in minecraft
 
SimplyFresh said:
Surely if people were to be voted out, it would end up being bias?

Let's say there was 8 people in that game and 6 of them was all friends/in a party. The two people who aren't in the party are most likely going to be voted out straight away, and in my opinion, that doesn't seem fair.

I still don't know, even giving them a secret identity may not work as they could still talk in their party, or giving them a secret identity is still similar to murder. I'll stay neutral for now.
Click to expand...
That also works the other way around.

Interesting concept, and would be fun to play, but it might be a bit too much for children on this server.
Also, it's a bit too open to aboose.
 
Kraetys said:
That also works the other way around.

Interesting concept, and would be fun to play, but it might be a bit too much for children on this server.
Also, it's a bit too open to aboose.
Click to expand...


I totally understand but maybe for the death you could just be sent to lobby!@
 
UhmmOkay said:
I totally understand but maybe for the death you could just be sent to lobby!@
Click to expand...
Not that kinda aboose.
The kind where you and 3 other friends dominate the game by all voting for one person at a time.
 
There are multiple reasons why I believe this should not be implemented, as follows:

•I feel as many players (especially younger ones) would become upset if they were to be voted out and this game could destroy friendships rapidly,

•You said you would try to survive by persuading others and building alliances ext.
UhmmOkay said:
Ways you can WIN:
Alliances
Persuading others
Click to expand...
This means to play the game you would have to communicate and talk to others- meaning you would all have to be the same launguage. Another fault with this concept is that some players do not like to interact with others- although most of the community do, not all players do.

•As stated by @SimplyFresh, the game can become extremely biased. Read her reply for the explanation on that.

•The final reason I am going to explain is that another server has a game exactly like this- therefore the game is unoriginal. Unorigional games is what PartyZone tends to avoid.

For these reasons is why I will be voting 'don't implement', sorry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SimplyFresh
Dragonnn_ said:
There are multiple reasons why I believe this should not be implemented, as follows:

•I feel as many players (especially younger ones) would become upset if they were to be voted out and this game could destroy friendships rapidly,

•You said you would try to survive by persuading others and building alliances ext.

This means to play the game you would have to communicate and talk to others- meaning you would all have to be the same launguage. Another fault with this concept is that some players do not like to interact with others- although most of the community do, not all players do.

•As stated by @SimplyFresh, the game can become extremely biased. Read her reply for the explanation on that.

•The final reason I am going to explain is that another server has a game exactly like this- therefore the game is unoriginal. Unorigional games is what PartyZone tends to avoid.

For these reasons is why I will be voting 'don't implement', sorry.
Click to expand...
While the younger player thing is true, the destroy friendships rapidly is not.
If a friendship is so easily broken by a game, it was not a friendship.

Language barrier has a point but this is a primarily english speaking server, unless PZ gets much larger, we shouldn't have a problem.

Bias is my reason for voting no, so kudos to you, finally a decent reason to tear someone down this time.

Actually unoriginal games are being considered now per multiple suggestions.
As long as they aren't exact copies and have a new mechanic or twist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Liillii
UhmmOkay said:
I played this game in a discord chat! As its very obvious lots of people like murder on mcpz. I haven't seen anyone do this on minecraft yet so here's my idea! <3

(Please note I am not that good with english grammar)

Everyone is a criminal ,and will be against each other, they each will sit at a table together and you're all trapped in a room.
You are trapped by a monster in the room. You will have to SACRIFICE one by one but you each will vote and the person with my most votes will die.
search
Until it comes to the final 2 the monster will choose randomly for one person to win, and set you free.
search


Ways of Winning:
Just don't DIE

Ways you can WIN:
Alliances
Persuading others
And much more things you should figure out >:D
Extra Perks:
One randomly chosen player will get a chance to have a saboteur power, one player will have to do a quest for an example having 2 people fight (but they cant let ANYONE know its them after the saboteur does those quests they will get safety for 2 trials and put 1 person automatically to death, But after the saboteur's safety ends everyone will vote who they think the saboteur is if ANYONE is right the saboteur will die)

Maps:
There will only be one map with a round table in a dark basement but you cant ever see the monster you can explore but there's only old items that are dusty and useless.

Although this isn't a really good idea i think it would be a unique mini game!

Thank you for reading this ,and I hope you will consider to put this in!


FAQ: (For questions below that I'll edit onto this thread)
Click to expand...
(Just going on my own opinion) this seems uninteresting to quite a lot of players, and I doubt it would attract new players, sorry :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Liillii
Dragonnn_ said:
There are multiple reasons why I believe this should not be implemented, as follows:

•I feel as many players (especially younger ones) would become upset if they were to be voted out and this game could destroy friendships rapidly,

•You said you would try to survive by persuading others and building alliances ext.

This means to play the game you would have to communicate and talk to others- meaning you would all have to be the same launguage. Another fault with this concept is that some players do not like to interact with others- although most of the community do, not all players do.

•As stated by @SimplyFresh, the game can become extremely biased. Read her reply for the explanation on that.

•The final reason I am going to explain is that another server has a game exactly like this- therefore the game is unoriginal. Unorigional games is what PartyZone tends to avoid.

For these reasons is why I will be voting 'don't implement', sorry.
Click to expand...

That is very true but i was thinking maybe only parties could of had private games only

@MorphicDream
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back