Hey fellows me again with another murder rank suggestion.
Why I made another thread idea:
I have a friend who had been at about rank 40 and went offline for about 6 months I would say. They still play 2 games about every month. What makes me interested is that he was at rank 40 and is now at rank 50? This is just shocking in my mind. Out for 6 months and only played 2 games per month (20 about in total). We are pretty close to equally skilled. Yet in stats innocents shot and games played are pretty different. I have 30k games played he has 10k games played ( and of course I have a lot of innocents shot lol). At first I though people were just passing through the ranks but clearly not. 10 ranks isn't that much to go through. If it was like 100 then I wouldn't really care at all.yet 10?
My second story is that a person that played for 2 months about with 1k games has gotten to rank 150. We are as well equally matched. This just makes things a bit stranger in my mind.
My suggestions:
1.Have the ranking system work in a way no matter how many games played or innocents shot it won't harm you perminately instead only for a limited time.
2. Make the system more "human vs human" not just numbers. Right now the system looks only on numbers not how well players go against players. I can't think of a way to make this happen but... I think the system should take who you won or lost against.
Why this will help:
The first suggestion will make terrible mistakes in the past not be too harmful in the future. Also to make the rank system more current than past events.
I suggested the second one because again the system only looks at numbers and never looks into how well a person can go against players that are medium high and lowly skilled. I hear and see so many players at low ranks beat higher ranks. The system doesn't feel like it is working at all if this is the case.
Why I made another thread idea:
I have a friend who had been at about rank 40 and went offline for about 6 months I would say. They still play 2 games about every month. What makes me interested is that he was at rank 40 and is now at rank 50? This is just shocking in my mind. Out for 6 months and only played 2 games per month (20 about in total). We are pretty close to equally skilled. Yet in stats innocents shot and games played are pretty different. I have 30k games played he has 10k games played ( and of course I have a lot of innocents shot lol). At first I though people were just passing through the ranks but clearly not. 10 ranks isn't that much to go through. If it was like 100 then I wouldn't really care at all.yet 10?
My second story is that a person that played for 2 months about with 1k games has gotten to rank 150. We are as well equally matched. This just makes things a bit stranger in my mind.
My suggestions:
1.Have the ranking system work in a way no matter how many games played or innocents shot it won't harm you perminately instead only for a limited time.
2. Make the system more "human vs human" not just numbers. Right now the system looks only on numbers not how well players go against players. I can't think of a way to make this happen but... I think the system should take who you won or lost against.
Why this will help:
The first suggestion will make terrible mistakes in the past not be too harmful in the future. Also to make the rank system more current than past events.
I suggested the second one because again the system only looks at numbers and never looks into how well a person can go against players that are medium high and lowly skilled. I hear and see so many players at low ranks beat higher ranks. The system doesn't feel like it is working at all if this is the case.
Last edited:
