General MCPZ suggestion.

[Luinion]

When players get unbanned for appealing and they have banned accounts on their ip they should get a note on their account saying *This user is not ban evading they appealed don't ban or else*


I'm saying this because i appealed and got accepted i logged in and got banned a minute later for ban evading because they did not check and banned accounts on my ip or they did not know that i appealed.

 

[Nashi]

First off- this should go under the ‘suggestions’ forum
Staff should be checking recent appeals before they ban someone for that, I believe. Having a system where staff have to manually insert everyone who to not ban (since I don’t think it’s possible to have it link automatically from forums to network) would be, for the most part, completely unnecessary.

 

[Jxliee]

Thread moved to suggestions.

 

[KinqOfTheClouds]

You talked about this on the Discord as well, and I'm going to send the exact same response you were given (by a Sr. Mod)
If you feel your rejection reason is invalid, message the staff member. No real need to carry the topic on here

 

[Mishiaa]

From my understanding, the user's punishment appeal was accepted, not rejected, yet once they joined they were banned again? Correct me if I'm wrong.

If this is a common issue and not just a one-time mess up:
While I was staff, we had a spreadsheet shared between us all that listed each player who's ban evasion appeal was accepted. It took maybe 30 seconds to add a player to the list or to check if a player was listed before banning. This was over a year ago so I wouldn't be surprised if it died out. If that's the case, it wouldn't hurt to start it back up or something similar to it. If there's already an efficient system in place, then it's just a matter of getting staff to be more thorough before dealing out punishments.

Having a system where staff have to manually insert everyone who to not ban (since I don’t think it’s possible to have it link automatically from forums to network) would be, for the most part, completely unnecessary.

It's not inconvenient at all and it's literally a staff members job to handle these kinds of situations. What is inconvenient, though, is having to appeal the same ban multiple times through no fault of your own. So I'd have to say it's actually pretty necessary. If the issue played out the way Luinion described it, they were unfairly punished.