Lack of Interest Make it public to everyone

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sensing a pattern... all the people whining about how people should have to buy elite to get on the survival server already have elite.
And I'm seeing a pattern of players who don't have Elite and are trying to get into Elite Survival without supporting the server like all of the Elites and Elite+s did.

If a player was looking for a good survival server and I join MCPZ, why would I donate for a rank if there are very little people on survival?
PartyZone was never strictly a survival server - it was and is a collection of minigames and game modes. If you want a "good" survival server that is flourishing with players, try looking elsewhere, somewhere that is actually meant to be a full-on survival server. PartyZone's survival server is meant to be a way to reward Elites for their amazing support toward PartyZone since most of the perks they get from Elite/E+ are already in VIP/VIP+ except for WorldEdit commands and more cosmetics. Elite Survival just gives E/E+s the option to hang out in a survival server and mess around.

There, I explained why I'm hitting the "don't implement" rating. Happy? :p
 
I'm sensing a pattern... all the people whining about how people should have to buy elite to get on the survival server already have elite.
Ahh yes, just because us Elites are saying the same thing does not mean much at all. Please just try to understand how it would be for the server itself. Less revenue.
 
Indeed because you dont see our perspective, you just see our ranks. We pay for our ranks, FOR the perks.
I assumed you paid for your ranks to get perks. That's generally why people buy ranks.
ELITE survival is one of the perks.
At the moment it is. That was the point of this thread, to see if it should be one of the perks of all players. not just people who have more money to buy stuff with.
We paid for this we arent gonna hand it to people who dont put in the same as we all did. Thats not how this works lol.
Are you a server owner? Or maybe a dev? If not, you aren't the one who chooses who gets what.
We see the pattern too, people who want Elite Survival to go public arent elite.
Yep, you're right. Some people either can't or won't buy ranks, but would still like to play on survival.
I and it is definitely not needed here. Once again, as @haris said, this has been a common topic, and this thread should be locked
Really grasping at straws, aren't you? It should be locked because it's been suggested before? You just want it locked because you don't like what it says.
 
Are you a server owner? Or maybe a dev? If not, you aren't the one who chooses who gets what.
Actually, PartyZone is a server that makes updates mostly based on suggestions and ideas submitted by the general public of the server, so in a sense, we are all the ones who choose, or at least get a say in, what happens around here.

Yep, you're right. Some people either can't or won't buy ranks, but would still like to play on survival.
Then play on a survival server that has more players, since that seems to be one of the "supporting reasons" for this suggestion to be implemented. Or, you could buy a realm and invite players instead. It's cheaper.

Really grasping at straws, aren't you? It should be locked because it's been suggested before? You just want it locked because you don't like what it says.
Or maybe people like you keep bringing this topic back up because you haven't accepted the fact that it most likely won't be implemented. I see you're new around here - I'll fill you in on how suggestions work. When a suggestion receives a lot of negative feedback, it is generally accepted that the suggestion will not be implemented. If a user tries to bring the topic back up, they need to have changed so much that the suggestion may change players' minds. For example, saying "let's make bed wars" will result in the suggestion being shot down because there isn't enough there. People bring bed wars up all the time and it gets shot down every time except for the ones who completely change the core mechanics of the game, and then they're able to have a better discussion about it with the community.

Getting back on topic: I have a rank on a very popular server. A while back, rewards that were given to players of my rank and above were toned down to be significantly less valuable. And I'll be honest, I felt cheated. Yes, the purchase agreement always says that rank perks might change, but usually when this happens, it's because ranks get new perks when they're developed, not because the developers are tearing perks out of donors' hands. It happens sometimes, but not always. The Elite/E+s who donated a lot of money to keep this server running would probably feel pretty cheated if their best perk was given to everyone.

And let's not forget the money problem.

Edit: I'm not trying to brag or anything, but realize that I'm only a VIP and I'm against the idea of allowing everyone to get into Elite Survival, and that's because I understand what it feels like to have a perk that I paid for ripped out of my hands. I also understand that implementing this suggestion may cause a loss of profit.
 
Actually, PartyZone is a server that makes updates mostly based on suggestions and ideas submitted by the general public of the server, so in a sense, we are all the ones who choose, or at least get a say in, what happens around here.


Then play on a survival server that has more players, since that seems to be one of the "supporting reasons" for this suggestion to be implemented. Or, you could buy a realm and invite players instead. It's cheaper.


Or maybe people like you keep bringing this topic back up because you haven't accepted the fact that it most likely won't be implemented. I see you're new around here - I'll fill you in on how suggestions work. When a suggestion receives a lot of negative feedback, it is generally accepted that the suggestion will not be implemented. If a user tries to bring the topic back up, they need to have changed so much that the suggestion may change players' minds. For example, saying "let's make bed wars" will result in the suggestion being shot down because there isn't enough there. People bring bed wars up all the time and it gets shot down every time except for the ones who completely change the core mechanics of the game, and then they're able to have a better discussion about it with the community.

Getting back on topic: I have a rank on a very popular server. A while back, rewards that were given to players of my rank and above were toned down to be significantly less valuable. And I'll be honest, I felt cheated. Yes, the purchase agreement always says that rank perks might change, but usually when this happens, it's because ranks get new perks when they're developed, not because the developers are tearing perks out of donors' hands. It happens sometimes, but not always. The Elite/E+s who donated a lot of money to keep this server running would probably feel pretty cheated if their best perk was given to everyone.

And let's not forget the money problem.

Edit: I'm not trying to brag or anything, but realize that I'm only a VIP and I'm against the idea of allowing everyone to get into Elite Survival, and that's because I understand what it feels like to have a perk that I paid for ripped out of my hands. I also understand that implementing this suggestion may cause a loss of profit.
This reply is so well written. +1
 
This suggestion is just not gonna happen, this thread should be locked. It's game over. @Harieo @Kasix
 
This suggestion is just not gonna happen, this thread should be locked. It's game over. @Harieo @Kasix
We are allowed to offer our own opinions to a suggestion, but the votes of the community don't always decide weather or not a suggestion will be implemented. (Look in the confirmed suggestions thread, then click on the link to "deleting unused profiles" for an example of this.)
 
We are allowed to offer our own opinions to a suggestion, but the votes of the community don't always decide weather or not a suggestion will be implemented. (Look in the confirmed suggestions thread, then click on the link to "deleting unused profiles" for an example of this.)
They almost always do, and this suggestion is literally being rated -12 +1 (probably him voting that for his own post if thats possible), I get your point but this isnt the first time something like this has come up, and its always the same endgame
 
They almost always do, and this suggestion is literally being rated -12 +1 (probably him voting that for his own post if thats possible), I get your point but this isnt the first time something like this has come up, and its always the same endgame
Maybe the developers will think of it as an option this time, we don't know what they have planned (mostly). You can't just beckon them to come and reject it for you.

It's not possible to react to your own post either.
 
Maybe the developers will think of it as an option this time, we don't know what they have planned (mostly). You can't just beckon them to come and reject it for you.

It's not possible to react to your own post either.
Look at the 2018 thread, they literally said updates coming for elite survival...
 
Look at the 2018 thread, they literally said updates coming for elite survival...
So? Plans can change. And what if those updates involve allowing players coming into ES (although that’s unlikely it’s possible)? We don’t know.

We shouldn’t continue this argument anymore.
 
So? Plans can change. And what if those updates involve allowing players coming into ES (although that’s unlikely it’s possible)? We don’t know.

We shouldn’t continue this argument anymore.
If it is called Elite Survival... I think that speaks for itself at this point. We never know. I'll stop now, again.
 
This suggestion is rejected due to overwhelming against votes by the public.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.