Lack of Interest Adding a rank Known As Co-Owner for gigosaurus

[ReHappened]

Idk why but it's kinda better because because may get confused who is the real owner but with Co-Owner as a rank they can tell that TeamPlayer is the owner of the server

 

[ABennn]

Gigosaurus is the original owner but, they are both owners, they both have the rank and I don't see the point in creating nore ranks when they are practically equal.

Sorry but, -1 from me.

 

[Fox]

gigo is the main owner and Teamplayer is the manager and HDev.
As stated above it would not make sense for added a new Rank when they are practically the same thing
-1 from me

 

[ReHappened]

 

[Fox]

Btw Dude, no need to rate our posts "I Disagree" for us giving feedback

 

[Lewie]

Hey,

What you say in this is incorrect firstly if there was a Co-Owner rank it would be given to @Teamplayer. The origional owners are @gigosaurus, @LanducciD, @OmgzMonkeh and @GamerGuts. This rank is also pointless. Co-Owner and Owner would have the same responsibilites. If you mean having it on the forums its still pointless same permissions same responsibilities. So Sorry Ned this is going to be a -1.

Can you get this thread seen by a Staff member? (@agh, @Unstitched, @MorphicDream)

 

[Chrissy]

Both are owners, but Gigosaurus is just the original. If Gigo wanted to switch it up, I'm sure he would

 

[Liillii]

As stated above gigo is the original owner so if this was to be implemented it would go to TeamPlayer. Also, I think this would be pointless, if you wanted to know who the original owner was just check forums. It's not exactly mistakable, the names are completely different.

-1