Similar to -a large network- we could use an ender dragon? Possibly retexture it if we do get a resource pack for the game
New Gametype Battle Royale {insert more creative name here}
- Thread starter Arujann
- Start date
Similar to -a large network- we could use an ender dragon? Possibly retexture it if we do get a resource pack for the game
This is a cool idea, but I have a problem with it. It's way too similar to SG to have them as separate games.
J
Jxliee
Guest
J
Jxliee
Guest
I’m not saying to go ahead and add this right now. Obviously— as anyone can see, our player count is dwindling and in the short-term most likely wouldnt be able to handle a game of this magnitude.
However, I don’t really see your reasoning behind “texture pack games always fail.” There are servers with games dedicated to texture pack based games— and to add onto that, the texture pack would be an optional addition to enhance the players’ game experience.
I don’t think it’s fair for you, or anyone, to judge how a certain game will be responded to without the game being implemented.
Your “fancy Survival Games” analogy is exactly my point. Our Survival Games failed due to lack of originality. There were practically no twists or fun additions to the game— thus making players get bored of it rather quickly. I made this suggestion to appease the people who wanted, but disliked, our version of Survival Games by giving it a new twist and new objectives.
I am fully aware of other networks trying to capitalize on making a version of Battle Royale— which is why my suggestion includes ways that would differ ours from theirs. Just because the same game is on two or more networks does not mean one of them won’t be played. There are many examples of games in which are on multiple servers that still draw a large crowd of people.
In conclusion— instead of down-voting suggestions that would benefit the server, maybe actually take them into consideration and putting personal bias aside. I’m not saying my suggestion is the one that’ll completely change the trajectory of the server— but I think it should be taken into consideration. From the looks of it, you rated my suggestion "Do not implement" without hearing me answer your questions and justifying why I feel the way I do. That is something I find unfair, especially coming from a Developer— who's responsibility it is to reason with players and help critique their ideas instead of shooting them down the moment they read them.
Last edited:
Thats definitely a really good Idea, and maybe they can name the gamemode "Party Royale", the only thing is that there should be a little bit more weapons like Assault Rifles and even more weapons.
Also I think it must be fun to add color for weapons to let people know how rare these weapons are.
Greetings,
Maurice | Kaizre
I don’t even think the server could gather enough players to make a Battle Royale game.
Well it depends on how many players we would need to start a game of Battle Royale.
Well it depends on how many players we would need to start a game of Battle Royale.
Yes, the server doesn't have enough players to make a real battle Royale game and it might not even be successful. But the point is we have to give it a shot and we can always start of making games begin with a small ratio and with time if we see that it's played more we can make it bigger.
Again, as I said several times— I’m not saying this is a suggestion to be implemented immediately, but once we have the player-count to support it.
If it were implemented with our current server traffic, it would be doomed to fail regardless of how good or bad it is. During the summer could be a possibility, it just depends how PZ holds up until then.
With that said, it could even be just a limited time game mode for the summer. If in September players request it back and enough ask for it, we could keep it on the server for good
well, i think especially for streams it’d be good since the main problem when they played fortnite on stream is players cant join
Okay, hold up, did you say that a Battle Royale game inspired by Fortnite WON'T attract players?
I mean, please! Pretty much anyone that can play Fortnite, will play Fortnite. Even if they can't, they'd really want to get some sort of taste of what it's like. Fortnite is an incredibly popular game, as is Minecraft, so if we mix the two together, I think that would get a hell of a lot of people to play. It might even attract other players to join the server when they see we have Battle Royale!
Also somebody said it would only need something like 24 players for a match, similar to Survival Games, due to the small playerbase, but later when we're more popular we could expand to 50, and maybe even 100.
Also one more thing...
Fortnite isn't first person, it's third person lmao
Perhaps, outline maybe? Or a glow if that's possible
or maybe
just some really bold and bright letters to make things magicalll
You may indeed.
The reason for my “Don’t impotent” vote is because I hate BR games. Another reason is other servers with a much larger player base than our own have got a BR game in testing, and it is incredibly glitchy. Another reason is that battle royale games are big games of 100 people, and personally, I think twelve people is too small for a solo game, and it all depends on the size of the map respective. If you were to have a map the same size as the server we don’t mention the games would be boring as you wouldn’t come across anyone.
-1