General Party Points For Ranks

Status
Not open for further replies.

Clex

Ultimate Partier
Elite+
Mar 19, 2016
210
191
2,157
20
Hidden Leaf Village
mcpz.net
Hey guys i just wanted to make a suggestion.I think ranks should get monthly Party points.Why i thinks this is a good idea is because you can only get party points by paying. But form i suggestion if you are a rank you can get some every month

Example:
Vip:1000
Vip+:2000
Elite:3000
E+:4000
Just saying i think we should do this but if you want you can edit the amount each player gets depending on rank
 
If someone was to get E+, they could exploit this by getting an extra 6000 party points by buying each rank one at a time.
 
If someone was to get E+, they could exploit this by getting an extra 6000 party points by buying each rank one at a time.
Not if you collected each rank's perks separately that would make up the joined total of their actual amount they receive.
 
Not if you collected each rank's perks separately that would make up the joined total of their actual amount they receive.
Sean. What I'm saying is when someone will buy VIP, they will gain the 1000 party points. Then buy VIP+ for 2000, Elite for 3000, and E+ for the 4000. exploiting the system for free party points.
 
That devalues the perk of buying it
And elite + will get all the perks of other ranks that means if vip gets 100 and elite + gets 1000, then e+ will get 1100.
 
I think that the idea is okay, but this means every pet that can be purchased would be purchased fast. I think if there is going to be passive generation of party points it should be
VIP: 50
VIP+: 100
Elite: 150
Elite +: 200

In general I can see the pros and cons of this
It would increase the value of ranks, but

It would devalue party points in general, to the point where selling party points directly will be pointless.
 
Going along with what has been said above, I kind of think that PartyPoints wouldn’t be purchased at all if players get them monthly for free. I wouldn’t.
 
._. now i feel dumb
No idea is ever dumb, it might not be liked but that doesn't mean it's dumb...

I just don't think having a constant pool of party points is a good idea. Yet having a limited end amount is what I prefer rather than unlimited.
 
I'd support this if they were given a lot less, reasons have been stated by others.
 
It would be a bit unfair if people could just buy ranks to get party points. Party points should be bought.
I don't fully agree , I would say if this were to happen we should only get like
Vip=5
Vip+=10
Elite=15
Elite+=20.
( A month )
 
I think that if ranks were to get party points, party points would still be bought separately. We would just need to not make the monthly party points that much. (like the one above)
 
Sean. What I'm saying is when someone will buy VIP, they will gain the 1000 party points. Then buy VIP+ for 2000, Elite for 3000, and E+ for the 4000. exploiting the system for free party points.

It wouldn’t work as it’s monthly. Getting 1,000 one month and then 2,000 the next is a waste of time, when instead you can get the whole 4,000 each month. It’s not like the monthly coins would reset after a rank up.

I do like this idea, but making it a little more fair (Defaults get 50, VIP 100, VIP+ 200, Elite 300 & E+ 350) would be a great addition!
 
It wouldn’t work as it’s monthly. Getting 1,000 one month and then 2,000 the next is a waste of time, when instead you can get the whole 4,000 each month. It’s not like the monthly coins would reset after a rank up.

I do like this idea, but making it a little more fair (Defaults get 50, VIP 100, VIP+ 200, Elite 300 & E+ 350) would be a great addition!

would it be fair to the ranks to give nonranks points though? I think that kind of takes away the whole point of buying them at all
 
would it be fair to the ranks to give nonranks points though? I think that kind of takes away the whole point of buying them at all

I mean, it wouldn’t be fair for non ranks to not get anything. Look at -big network- for example. They let defaults get monthly mystery boxes, just not as much.
 
I mean, it wouldn’t be fair for non ranks to not get anything. Look at -big network- for example. They let defaults get monthly mystery boxes, just not as much.
Though, the whole point of a rank is that I payed real money. Why should someone who plays here for free get something - for free - that you have to pay for with real money to get? It makes NO sense. If this were to be implemented, I would not want a no rank to get a paid item for free monthly. I payed real money. Elite+s especially. $140 is a lot of money. For that much, please give me monthly party points. Someone who paid $140 less than me should not get the SAME perk. Even if it’s less per month. It’s a significant devaluation of Premium Ranks. And as for the fairness in giving it to non ranks, life isn’t fair. Maybe you should pay 20 bucks and earn it.
 
Though, the whole point of a rank is that I payed real money. Why should someone who plays here for free get something - for free - that you have to pay for with real money to get? It makes NO sense. If this were to be implemented, I would not want a no rank to get a paid item for free monthly. I payed real money. Elite+s especially. $140 is a lot of money. For that much, please give me monthly party points. Someone who paid $140 less than me should not get the SAME perk. Even if it’s less per month. It’s a significant devaluation of Premium Ranks.

50 ≠ 300. I appolgize, but your argument is very invalid. You’re practically saying “since I paid more than this VIP+, they should not have /speed”. It is not a devaluation because, once again, 50 ≠ 300. Heck, you can’t even buy anything with 50 party points! If anything, this shows dedication with players who want to buy a pet and save up a staggering 1,000 coins (20 months for a default and 4 months for an E+, may I add) instead of buying their way to every pet available. Also, $140 is a lot of money, but many people buy it on sale (at the value of Elite or even VIP+). Should those who purchased via sale not have their rank because they paid less? Once again, your argument is very invalid and doesn’t make sense to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.