There are pros and cons in this. Though I do believe that bystanders should be more challenged into owning a gun.
Maybe
after you get a gun, it'll
decrease the amount back to 5 emeralds to keep it at a normal rate?
Sorry but I'll have to -1 on this. I personally feel that with the size of the maps and usual amount of players online, there is a fair amount of challenge for both the murderer and the bystanders.
I kind of agree and disagree on this idea. Size of the maps are pretty big. And I don't see why it's "a fair amount of challenge for both the murderer and the bystanders."
I agree, it is already
fair. But the murderer usually has a disadvantage of winning the game due to everyone automatically getting a gun. In a blink of an eye, you'll see people gathering up on you with guns and immeadiatly kill you.
This is in fact, very obnoxious. I find it very annoying for the murderer who tries to kill everyone who has guns, and yes, he/she maybe able to use their Knife Shoot, but there's always at least a 90% chance that the murderer will miss the shot. It has happened to me.
I much agree that the Emerald Rate should be extended to at least 7-9 emeralds. It may sound
too hard for bystanders, but it still gives that bit of advantage that the murderer will have.
Not to mention, there is already a detective. So I wouldn't worry of the murderer automatically killing
every, single player.
In conclusion, I'm giving this suggestion a +1.