Rejected Decrease Players Needed To Start

[Pqndar]

Why do we need this?
We don't it's just because Splatter isn't having popular ammounts playing
Decrease To?
Maybe Just 6 Players Needed and 8 As Max?

 

[ABennn]

Why do we need this?
We don't it's just because Splatter isn't having popular ammounts playing
Decrease To?
Maybe Just 6 Players Needed and 8 As Max?

Just would have to be an even ammount

 

[Pqndar]

Just would have to be an even ammount

Yeah If it was 6 the countdown would start but if another joined then it was seven it'd stop

 

[NightWhispers]

Yes this would all be nice but 4v4 is the best setting for splatter

 

[Pqndar]

Yes this would all be nice but 4v4 is the best setting for splatter

I know 4v4 is the best thing but at the moment its not having popular amounts at the moment it could be decreased to 6 players needed and when more popular back to 4v4 = 8 players

 

[teflonpresident]

I like this a lot. I always get stuck with people who have been waiting a while, and once we get 8, they quit out of impatience. Very useful, +1.

 

[inezie]

Yeah If it was 6 the countdown would start but if another joined then it was seven it'd stop

I'm kind of neutral on this. I think even if there are seven people it should start. I mean, a lot of times when I've played someone ends up leaving mid-game anyways. If it's uneven people can still play and have fun. I'd rather start a game that's uneven than have to wait for eight players once a seventh person joined. Plus, it could anger a lot of people if there are six people in the game and right before the game starts a seventh person joined, making them have to wait for another person.

 

[Zantoro]

Why do we need this?
We don't it's just because Splatter isn't having popular ammounts playing
Decrease To?
Maybe Just 6 Players Needed and 8 As Max?

I agree, but I guess it depends if it stays unpopular for a long time.

 

[Pqndar]

I'm kind of neutral on this. I think even if there are seven people it should start. I mean, a lot of times when I've played someone ends up leaving mid-game anyways. If it's uneven people can still play and have fun. I'd rather start a game that's uneven than have to wait for eight players once a seventh person joined. Plus, it could anger a lot of people if there are six people in the game and right before the game starts a seventh person joined, making them have to wait for another person.

But then it is an uneven amount of players

 

[inezie]

But then it is an uneven amount of players

If it's uneven people can still play and have fun. I'd rather start a game that's uneven than have to wait for eight players once a seventh person joined.

 

[Pqndar]

Actually that makes sense!

 

[MariTheVillain]

Hello, and thank you for your suggestion. Due to this gametype no longer existing on the network, this suggestion is now being automatically denied. Apologies for the inconvenience